A Bible full of errors?
episode 5 of "Fighting Free of God?"
What might be called 'liberal theology' can be traced back to the late seventeenth century, when Christian ideas began to be subjected to rationalist critiques. And, as we saw in the second episode of this series, such critiques became a lot sharper during the following century, under the assaults of the philosophes.
But what we call 'biblical criticism' — the undermining of biblical credibility as to dating, authorship, historical reliability etc. — really took off during the nineteenth century. And, though these discussions were largely confined to academia, in the long run they had profoundly secularising effects. For the students went on to become pastors. Some of them taught the new ideas from the pulpits; others, more cautious, merely remained silent about key Christian doctrines in which they no longer believed. But where either route was followed, the eventual result was a greatly watered down faith among ordinary believers — with zero motivation for evangelism.
It bears pointing out that, until well into the twentieth century, this was a specifically Protestant problem. It was precisely the (relative!) obscurantism of the Catholic and Orthodox churches (which had problems of their own) that shielded their flocks from these new ways of thinking. We explore the story — just in outline, of course — in this episode!




Thanks Meic & Koelle. Another helpful series. Even though I'm pretty familiar with most of the themes you've been exploring since the beginning of your adventure into vlodcasting, I find your conversations helpful as I revisit each theme more than 30 years after leaving theological college. Everything looks so different now I have decades of life experience behind me.
Jesus' encounter with Nicodemus makes me wonder whether the evangelical preoccupation with believing the right doctrines in order to be saved is really what Jesus' ministry was all about. Nicodemus 'believed' the right facts about Jesus, but did he not learn that the call is not just to 'believe' but to participate in God's rule using the new faculties given by the Spirit? With this in mind, Spurgeon's preoccupation with meeting halls filled with 'worshippers' looks little more than a prideful focus on drawing crowds who will be thrilled by his own oratorical skills.
Your critique of liberal theology is sound (in my opinion), but I also think that what it was trying to oppose was the preoccupation of evangelical theology with being saved from the wrath of a sin-focused god. Evangelical theology so disposed becomes reductionist and transactional, and is equally unable to call unbelievers to examine the reasons Jesus came to live amongst us.